On 12/05/12 00:18, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > While the license sounds like it is "Public Domain" that can cause > problems in various places. Also in trying to find the code that is > referenced.. (snook.ca) I could not find a copy to see what its > license was. The second site doesn't recommend that code anymore but > recommends a GPL2+ updated version.
It looks more like WTFPL with attribution clause. I don't see why such license would be a problem. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
