On 12/05/2012 06:34 AM, Daniel Kinzler wrote: >> I think that makes sense. The spam filters will work best if they are >> aware of how wikidata works, and have access to the full JSON >> information of the change. > > You really want the spam filter extensions to have internal knowledge of > Wikibase? That seems like a nasty cross-dependency, and goes directly against > the idea of modularization and separation of concerns...
I agree it should not have internal implementation knowledge. I meant how it works in a different sense. More specifically, what if Wikidata exposed a JSON object representing an external version of each change (essentially a data API). It could allow hooks to register for this (I think is similar to the EditEntity idea). Matt Flaschen _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
