On 12/07/2012 04:19 PM, Antoine Musso wrote: > Le 07/12/12 04:56, Sébastien Santoro wrote > <snip> >> This is very disturbing when browsing Gerrit for revisions still to >> review and doesn't really give any useful information (as the >> important information here would be the verified -1). > > Lets open the can of worm here :) > > Chad came up with another idea that would be to rename Verified to > Automatic Tests and extends it to a range of -2 .. +2 where +1 will be > lint ok and +2 unit tests ok
Should there be a separate label for human testing and verification (as opposed to Code Review, which could just mean "after visual review, the code looks right")? Matt Flaschen _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
