On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 16:37:47 -0800, Ori Livneh <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
Just a heads-up that I nominated Krenair (Alex Monk) for inclusion in
mediawiki/core:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Git/Gerrit_project_ownership#Krenair_for_MediaWiki_Core
For supporting evidence, see:
*
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/q/owner:krenair+project:mediawiki/core,n,z
*
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=specific&product=MediaWiki&content=krenair%40gmail.com
* http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Krenair
Please consider weighing in.
Thanks,
Ori
--
Ori Livneh
Why is a list of commits considered valid evidence for determining if
someone is worth giving +2?
One does not review their own commits. The commits made by the user
themselves are irrelevant as it would be irresponsible for the +2 to be
given in order for said line of commits to be reviewed. The +2 is for use
in reviewing other users' commits.
More to the point, better evidence would be a history of -1 and +1 the
user has made. Are the user's +1's in line with whether a +2 was
eventually made (not retaining +1 on something that was decided should be
rejected)? Does the user make +1 and -1's to aid review of commits that
don't get much review from others till after the user has already been
helping review the commits for awhile? etc...
--
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://danielfriesen.name/]
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
