On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Ryan Kaldari <[email protected]> wrote:
> Personally, I don't mind implementing it either way, but would like to have
> consensus on where this code should reside. The code is pretty clean and
> lightweight, so it wouldn't increase the footprint of core MediaWiki (it
> would actually decrease the existing footprint slightly since it replaces
> more hacky existing core code). So core bloat isn't really an issue. The
> issue is: Where does it most make sense for disambiguation features to
> reside? Should disambiguation pages be supported out of the box or require
> an extension to fully support?
>

I'd say extension. I can think of lots of wikis that don't use
disambiguation pages. If we really want, we can stash it in
the default tarball along with the other bundled extensions.

-Chad

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to