I agree with extension. For example, my school's IT department uses a wiki to collect information about common computer problems, and on a wiki about computer problems, none of the issues share the same name.
*--* *Tyler Romeo* Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015 Major in Computer Science www.whizkidztech.com | [email protected] On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Chad <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Ryan Kaldari <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Personally, I don't mind implementing it either way, but would like to > have > > consensus on where this code should reside. The code is pretty clean and > > lightweight, so it wouldn't increase the footprint of core MediaWiki (it > > would actually decrease the existing footprint slightly since it replaces > > more hacky existing core code). So core bloat isn't really an issue. The > > issue is: Where does it most make sense for disambiguation features to > > reside? Should disambiguation pages be supported out of the box or > require > > an extension to fully support? > > > > I'd say extension. I can think of lots of wikis that don't use > disambiguation pages. If we really want, we can stash it in > the default tarball along with the other bundled extensions. > > -Chad > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
