On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Brian Wolff <bawo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Some people have claimed that CACHE_DB might even slow things down compared > to CACHE_NONE when used as main cache type (cache db is still better than > cache none for slow caches like the parser cache). Anyhow you should do > profiling type things when messing with caching settings (or any > performance settings) to see what is effective and what is not. > > -bawolff > Wouldn't be surprised. ;) The only problem is that with CACHE_NONE, many things (specifically, throttling mechanisms) won't work since the cache isn't persistent across requests. *-- * *Tyler Romeo* Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015 Major in Computer Science www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
