<quote name="Leslie Carr" date="2013-05-07" time="11:43:47 -0700">
>
> I think this is awesome for features ... but if we're putting work
> into this, I would love even more to have a clustered a+b production
> environment, such that 10% of folks are put on the new release
> (cluster a) and then it gets pushed over to cluster b. Then we can
> also test performance in a real world environment, and breakages only
> happen for 10% (PS the 10% number was pulled out of thin air).
I really like this idea, I think. So bringing various concurrent (email)
threads together; long term we could have something that looks like
this (roughly):
1) Change proposed
- Jenkins runs tests on a throw away labs instance
2) Change merged to master
- Jenkins/etc runs tests on betalabs
3) New wmfXX released to 10% of cluster
- "10%" being something like: test, test2, mediawiki.org, and some of
the non-'pedia project sites
- Our users do the testing ;-)
4) That wmfXX goes to the rest of the cluster
- Hopefully all is good.
Is that kind of what you had in mind, Leslie?
Greg
--
| Greg Grossmeier GPG: B2FA 27B1 F7EB D327 6B8E |
| identi.ca: @greg A18D 1138 8E47 FAC8 1C7D |
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
