Yuvi Panda writes: > Hello! Our current generated documentation[1] uses doxygen, and > leaves... a number of things to be desired - such as:
What about a bug report [or a patch ;-)]? Jan > 1. Not be tortoise slow > 2. Have usable search > 3. Prettier interface > > I was looking around for alternatives, and ran into phpdocumentor2[2]. > The project still seems active (latest commit was 3 days ago, and for > vagrant support!), and the demo was quite pretty: > > http://demo.phpdoc.org/Responsive/namespaces/phpDocumentor.html > > Is there any particular reason we are still sticking with doxygen? Or > is it just 'someone needs to find the time to move things over to the > new system'? > > [1]: https://doc.wikimedia.org/mediawiki-core/master/php/html/ > [2]: http://www.phpdoc.org/ > > -- > Yuvi Panda T > http://yuvi.in/blog > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[email protected]> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | AvatarĀ® http://AvatarAcademy.nl _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
