Yuvi Panda writes:

> Hello! Our current generated documentation[1] uses doxygen, and
> leaves... a number of things to be desired - such as:

What about a bug report [or a patch ;-)]?

Jan

> 1. Not be tortoise slow
> 2. Have usable search
> 3. Prettier interface
>
> I was looking around for alternatives, and ran into phpdocumentor2[2].
> The project still seems active (latest commit was 3 days ago, and for
> vagrant support!), and the demo was quite pretty:
>
> http://demo.phpdoc.org/Responsive/namespaces/phpDocumentor.html
>
> Is there any particular reason we are still sticking with doxygen? Or
> is it just 'someone needs to find the time to move things over to the
> new system'?
>
> [1]: https://doc.wikimedia.org/mediawiki-core/master/php/html/
> [2]: http://www.phpdoc.org/
>
> --
> Yuvi Panda T
> http://yuvi.in/blog
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[email protected]> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | AvatarĀ®  http://AvatarAcademy.nl  

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to