On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Chad <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm in favor of option (C), mainly because I think that titles are > pointless and > lead to hat collecting and hurt feelings.
Titles are useful for a few things: * Prospects of future employment * Clarity around who to talk to about what > I respect Brion, Mark and Tim (and > many others) as architects because they *are* architects, not because we > call them such. > We call them such, because they are such - it is a useful designation. > For RFCs, I've been of the opinion we've made them entirely too formal. I'm > glad we're trying to move them forward, but I've always thought they should > be based on community consensus, not convincing an architect. > Generally agreed, although I think this is more of a procedural point and perhaps orthogonal to roles/titles and what they mean. -- Arthur Richards Software Engineer, Mobile [[User:Awjrichards]] IRC: awjr +1-415-839-6885 x6687 _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
