On 11/07/2013 08:40 AM, C. Scott Ananian wrote: > I thought it might be useful to have a hierarchy > of 'architects'. If there are 20 architects, then maybe it doesn't seem > like such a big deal. (And maybe they shouldn't be called 'architects' but > rather 'module owners'.) > > Basically, every major piece of WP should have a module owner. For > example, gwicke owns Parsoid. Maybe at some point he gets bored and moves > on to something else, and names someone else the module owner. (That > shouldn't involve any adjustment to WMF salary!)
Is your proposal different from https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Developers/Maintainers ? -- Quim Gil Technical Contributor Coordinator @ Wikimedia Foundation http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Qgil _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
