From my own experience it would be faster and less painful to implement my own "patrolled edits" feature / queue using some own interface on labs for example, than getting anything passed through RFC on enwp :P
But if anyone is in a mood to commit suicide, you can of course start a RFC on english wikipedia On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Alex <mrzmanw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Currently, but you could always get consensus to get it enabled. > > RC patrolling was switched off in 2005 - > https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28news%29&diff=9146943&oldid=9146404 > > NP patrolling was turned on in 2007 - > https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/patrolled_pages&oldid=171938297 > > And the API didn't support patrolling until 2008 - > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/40435 > > So obviously things have changed a lot and you may have an actual use case > for it now. That said, I'm not sure patrolled edits is really the best > option. It sounds like you want a queue that you can add things to for later > review. But with patrolled edits, you can only remove things. So if *every* > unpatrolled edit goes through huggle and is either reverted, patrolled, or > left for later review, it would work. But if it doesn't look at every edit, > then your queue is going to be a mix of "suspicious edits" and things that > were never looked at in the first place. > > Only admins, bots, and people in the autopatrol group would have their edits > patrolled automatically, which means you'd have to patrol the edits of a > large fraction of regular users. > > -- > Alex > > > On 12/10/2013 9:24 AM, Petr Bena wrote: >> >> OK, so the original suggestion I got from Nemo >> >> (http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2013-September/072047.html) >> to use patrolling as solution for "suspicious edits queue" (which I >> proposed here >> http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2013-September/072038.html >> ) was actually not possible, because the feature is disabled anyway... >> >> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Theopolisme <theopolismew...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> On the English Wikipedia, only new *pages* are patrolled. This is the >>> case >>> on most Wikimedia wikis, actually. See [1] >>> >>> [1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Patrolled_edit#Patrolled_pages >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Petr Bena <benap...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I was recently suggested by someone (and requested by someone else) to >>>> use patrolling on good edits in huggle, however after executing the >>>> patrol api query I receive this error: >>>> >>>> <?xml version="1.0"?><api servedby="mw1130"><error >>>> code="patroldisabled" info="Patrolling is disabled on this wiki" >>>> /></api> >>>> >>>> Is it true? Is patrolling really disabled on English wikipedia? It >>>> sounds to me very unlike, so is this a bug and different error message >>>> should have been displayed? >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Wikitech-l mailing list >>>> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> *Theo (User:Theopolisme on >>> Wikipedia)http://enwp.org/wiki/User:Theopolisme >>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Theopolisme>* >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wikitech-l mailing list >>> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikitech-l mailing list >> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
