<quote name="Federico Leva (Nemo)" date="2014-02-15" time="22:52:31 +0100"> > And surely, before WMF/"MediaWiki" tell the world that no free fonts > of good quality exist, there will be some document detailing exactly > why and based on what arguments/data/research the numerous free > alternatives were all rejected? Free fonts developers are an > invaluable resource for serving Wikimedia projects' content in all > languages, we shouldn't carelessly slap them in their face.
I just skimmed the entire thread again, and yes, this has been requested a few times but no one from the WMF Design team has responded with that analysis (or if would respond with an analysis). The first time it was requested the person was told to ask the Design list, then the next message CC'd the design list, but no response on that point. I don't see much on https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Typography_refresh nor it's talk page. Nor https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Design/Typography cc'ing the Design list :) Greg -- | Greg Grossmeier GPG: B2FA 27B1 F7EB D327 6B8E | | identi.ca: @greg A18D 1138 8E47 FAC8 1C7D | _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
