On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Rachel Farrand <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Please join us on google hangout June 11 @ 1900 UTC
> <
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=WikiFont&iso=20140611T12&p1=224&ah=1
> >
> for the following Tech Talk:
>
>
> *How, What, Why of WikiFont*
> *Presented by Core Features Engineer: Shahyar Ghobadpour, Visual Designer:
> May Galloway and Mobile Apps Engineer: Monte Hurd*
>
> *Wikifont-glyphs is a collection of icons that have been used in our
> projects, made into a font. We will be showcasing how you can take
> advantage of this icon font set, how to request for more icons and
> contribute to the set. *
>
> If you want to watch live you can join the hangout here
> <https://plus.google.com/events/chpgv8usjd6dn38on07njjk28hg> and follow
> along and ask questions in #wikimedia-office on IRC.
>
> More info about Wikifont here
> <https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Design/Wikifont>
>
> The WebFont Tech Talk will also be available for viewing later here
> <https://www.youtube.com/user/watchmediawiki> on the mediawiki youtube
> channel.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Rachel
>

Thank you very much for the interesting talk, everybody. I do have a follow
up question though, that I didn't think of during the talk. It was
indicated that the glyphs will occupy the private use space. Many symbols
already have their own codepoints over severals blocks,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicode_Symbols . Would it make sense for
those symbols that already have a code point to use the already defined
code point rather than a private use code point? I'm thinking about the
star, black star, pencil, paperclip and gear for example, but I think the
same goes for most glyps on the image in the github page.

--Martijn

_______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to