I do urge you to start such a discussion, bawolff. It would seem to me that a one- or two-week RFC should be sufficient to opt out contributions to MediaWiki. I'd be happy to support, even though it's more likely that I'll star in the next James Bond film than ever write a line of code.
Risker/Anne On 16 June 2014 16:25, Brian Wolff <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > So from what I understand, there's now been an amendment to WMF's > terms of use to require disclosure of paid "contributions" [1]. Its a > little unclear how this applies to MediaWiki as a project, but a > literal reading of the policy makes it seem like MediaWiki is > included. > > * MediaWiki is arguably a project of the Wikimedia foundation. The > foundation's website says as much [2] > *A commit/patchset certainly seems like a contribution. > > Thus the new policy would require anyone submitting code to use to > declare who they work for. Personally this seems both unnecessary to > me, as well as unlikely to be followed. For example, I see no reason > why some person who uses our software should have to declare who they > work for when they upstream a bug fix, etc. > > I would suggest we follow commons' lead [3], and declare that we do > not have disclosure requirements for people giving us code. > > --bawolff > > [1] > https://wikimediafoundation.org/w/index.php?title=Terms_of_Use&diff=0&oldid=90463 > [2] https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Our_projects > [3] > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Requests_for_comment/Alternative_paid_contribution_disclosure_policy > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
