On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 8:10 AM, Risker <[email protected]> wrote:
> A lot of the "solutions"  normally bandied about involve things like
> two-factor identification, which has the "additional" password coming
> through a separate route (e.g., gmail two-factor ID sends a second password
> as a text to a mobile) and means having more expensive technology) or using
> technology like dongles that cannot be sent to users in certain countries.

Actually, most modern internet implementations use the TOTP algorithm
open standard that anyone can use for free.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time-based_One-time_Password_Algorithm>
One of the most common methods, other than through text messages, is
the Google Authenticator App that anyone can download for free on a
smart phone. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Authenticator>.

I'm not sure we can make any of these extra protections *required*
without a lot of discussion, but giving people the option will
certainly help. Wikimedians are usually a pretty geeky and paranoid
bunch, so I think a good amount of people would take advantage of
additional security features. This is especially true given how many
people use <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:User_committed_identity>
on enwiki, something I've never really understood the point of. :-)

-- 
Casey Brown (Cbrown1023)
caseybrown.org

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to