On 2014-08-16, 4:56 PM, Yuvi Panda wrote: > On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 12:40 AM, svetlana <[email protected]> wrote: >> Why not use in-browser offline storage? >> http://www.html5rocks.com/en/features/storage > One of my favorite articles: > http://alistapart.com/article/application-cache-is-a-douchebag
On 2014-08-16, 5:15 PM, svetlana wrote: > ... > That is OK, you and Yuvi Panda highlighted some important points. > Thanks to both - I'll follow-up if I find solution to the application cache > issues raised in the blog post linked earlier. > > svetlana Issues? The article is one of my favourites too, if you read through the whole thing it describes a technique of combining appcache, localStorage, and an iframe to make it possible for a site like Wikipedia to be made to work offline. And localStorage could even be substituted for IndexedDB (with a polyfill for WebSQL only browsers). ~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://danielfriesen.name/] _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
