I can help a bit with review. I maintain the check[0] service for the Tor project.
[0] https://check.torproject.org/ On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Legoktm <legoktm.wikipe...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/23/14, 4:56 AM, Quim Gil wrote: > > According to our algorithm (*), TorBlock currently has the worse track > > reviewing code contributions -- even after Tim gave a -1 to one of the > > three open patches last week (thanks!). There are two patches from Tyler > > that haven't received any feedback at all since August 2013. > > > > > https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/q/status:open+project:mediawiki/extensions/TorBlock,n,z > > I left comments on all the patches. The -1's are mainly due to rebasing > needed. > > > Your help reviewing these patches is welcome. > > > > It is not surprising that this extension has no maintaner listed at > > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Developers/Maintainers (someone suggested > > Tim in that table, he disagrees and edited accordingly). > > > > Also, maybe someone is interested in maintaining this extension? Only > > eleven patches submitted in the last 15 months. > > Probably not since I don't really know that much about tor, but I'm > willing to review Tyler's patches if he's unable to find other people. > > -- Legoktm > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
