I heard from one editor, who shall remain nameless, that they had a lot to fear from certain people for political reasons and they edit anyway.
As we have seen with incidents in even democratic countries, even their officials, deep-pocketed litigators, businesses, or extrimists sometimes threaten or take a variety of hostile actions against Wikimedia contributors, bloggers, journalists, or members of groups that they dislike. Pine On Oct 2, 2014 7:12 PM, "Marc A. Pelletier" <m...@uberbox.org> wrote: > On 10/02/2014 09:57 PM, Kevin Wayne Williams wrote: > > I'm just amused by people that view making such edits anonymously as > > some intrinsic right. > > I would expect that most of the people who (sincerely) feel strongly > about a putative right to edit anonymously are more likely to be looking > for edits about political topics than pop culture; few people are hunted > down for spewing trivia about the Mousketeers, tarnishing the image of > one's Glorious Leader might be more perilous. > > Which is, IMO, a good reason to not attempt to do so. > > -- Marc > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
