(Moving epriestley to Bcc)

Yes, this is a known issue and is being tracked at
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T91488

Sorry for the noise in your mailboxes. We hope to be able to clean up your
tasks.

On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Petr Kadlec <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> somebody probably already noticed this, but I didn’t see any discussion
> around, so just to be sure:
>
> I have received notifications about commits being assigned to old bugs in
> Phabricator by epriestley. See for instance T4123 [1] – “epriestley added a
> commit: Unknown Object (Commit)”.
>
> It seems to me the problem is that somehow the Wikimedia instance of
> Phabricator and the Phabricator instance of Phabricator (erm… the Phacility
> instance? secure.phabricator.org, I mean) got
> crossed/synchronized/whatever. Therefore their commit D7601 [2], marked as
> fixing _their_ bug T4123 [3] somehow modified _our_ bug T4123. [1] It might
> have been helped by the fact Evan Priestley has the same “epriestley”
> account at both installations.
>
> While adding nonexistent commits makes a bit of a mess, it’s not a huge
> problem, but some of these commits changed state of the underlying task as
> well, which is worse. See epriestley’s feed [4]. I guess those would need
> to be reverted?
>
> -- [[cs:User:Mormegil | Petr Kadlec]]
>
>    [1]: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T4123
>    [2]: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7601
>    [3]: https://secure.phabricator.com/T4123
>    [4]: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/p/epriestley/feed/
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l




-- 
Quim Gil
Engineering Community Manager @ Wikimedia Foundation
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Qgil
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to