On Jul 6, 2015 01:13, "S Page" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Brian Wolff <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > First of all, the links at the beginning, should not go directly to
> > the projects in question, they should go to pages explaining how to
> > use those projects in question on the outside.
>
>
> Agreed, T104282 'Create landing pages for the free open knowledge sources
> on the Data and Developer Hub.'
>
>
> > If they wanted to just
> > visit the wiki, they would have done that (Perhaps, this was already
> > planned, and the current version is still just an early draft with not
> > all the pieces in place yet?)
> >
> > Second, the existing showcased projects, seem to much like the sort of
> > thing someone making a mobile Wikipedia App would want. Most people
> > probably don't want article excerpts in their search results (I assume
> > anyways). Most people aren't searching through a list of Wikipedia
> > articles, unless they are wikipedia or related to wikipedia.
> >
> > But we do have one of the largest collections of (mostly) organized
> > knowledge available for free (In both senses of the word). This is
> > valuable, and quite unique on the internet. We should capitalize on
> > this.
> >
> > Things like "Show a short snippet about this topic from Wikipedia" (+
> > a link to more information) could be quite useful to many people.
> >
>
> Sure, that's Hovercards. It's a subset of
>
http://devhub.wmflabs.org/wiki/API:Page_info_in_search_results#Showing_useful_page_information
> and I mention it at the end. Should we provide more than sample API calls?
> Would a JS module that formats the results be useful?
>
> The interesting challenge is how to identify "this topic". Will websites
> manually link to Michael Jackson (radio commentator)
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Jackson_%28radio_commentator%29> or
> just link "Michael Jackson" and hope for the best? Should we be
> evangelizing wikidata numbers like Q6831566 for external apps?

Yes. Having clear identifiers for identifying concepts for these usecases
is exactly what Wikidata identifiers are made for.

> Another thing sites can do is related content, I just learned about
> CirrusSearch's morelike: search operator.
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=search&srsearch=morelike:Michael_Jackson&srlimit=10&srprop=size&formatversion=2
> .  Such page retrieval and searches all tend to query for lead image and
> textextract or wikitext description, so articles on them would overlap,
but
> that's OK.
>
> Commons is another great resource because its information can be
> > easily broken up into digestible parts like a single image (Which is
> > much harder for a Wikipedia article). I think things like
> > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/PhotoCommons which would allow a
> > website operator to quickly allow their users to add stock photos to
> > whatever it is their users do, is a good thing to focus on.
> >
> > Wikidata seems almost custom made for the type of user who would like
> > to add cusom knowledge to their website.
> >
>
> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Dev.wikimedia.org/Contributing , you can
> propose these and if you know of examples doing this, even better.
>
>
> > The other thing that should definitely be on the dev hub, is probably
> > a link to our terms. We should emphasize that you can use your data,
> > and we generally don't track you the way a facebook like button does.
> > That you don't need an api key or anyone's permission. Of course we
> > should also state what you do need to do (Give credit/follow license,
> > set a user-agent header)
> >
>
> Yup T317  '"Terms of Use" must be prominently featured in the Developer
> Hub'. I was thinking of mentioning it in the three adding it to the
footer,
> but maybe that's not prominent enough.
>
> Great feedback, thanks.
> --
> =S Page  WMF Tech writer
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to