Hi John -- What do you think would be a better sample? My feeling is that a 24 hour period captures global usage and we're currently at about .01% of page views come to these domains is a pretty good indicator. Keep in mind we're doing this for a legitimate technical reason and not arbitrarily. Looking at the UAs is a good idea and we will do that.
thanks, -Toby On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 6:55 AM, John <[email protected]> wrote: > Can we look at a wider sample? using a single day as judgement factor is a > bad idea. However if the data supports your position I dont see any serious > problems. You might want to take a look at either the UA's or refering > sources to see if there is a primary source for the traffic and mitigate > that. > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Adam Baso <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Looks like the user pageviews for wap.wikipedia.org and > > mobile.wikipedia.org > > subdomains are approximately 0.02% of the size of pageviews for > > m.wikipedia.org subdomains based on a recent one day check. > > > > hive> select count(*) from > > wmf.webrequest where > > year = 2015 and month = 7 and day = 14 > > and access_method = 'mobile web' > > and (uri_host like '%.wap.wikipedia.org' OR uri_host like '%. > > mobile.wikipedia.org') > > and is_pageview = true and agent_type = 'user'; > > > > 35,543 > > > > hive> select count(*) from > > wmf.webrequest where > > year = 2015 and month = 7 and day = 14 > > and access_method = 'mobile web' > > and uri_host like '%.m.wikipedia.org' > > and is_pageview = true and agent_type = 'user'; > > > > 202,024,891 > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 5:41 AM, John <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > ... Have we done any analysis on usage of those subdomains? > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Adam Baso <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > There's a ticket for removing mobile.wikipedia.org and > > wap.wikipedia.org > > > > domains/subdomains, which are legacy domain names superceded by > > > > m.wikipedia.org and its subdomains. > > > > > > > > https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T104942 > > > > > > > > The rationale for the removal of these legacy domain names is to help > > > > support HSTS preloading in browsers with the existing TLS SAN cert. > > > > > > > > After review of the ticket, can anyone think of a compelling reason > to > > > keep > > > > those old domain names? > > > > > > > > I'm going to open a separate thread on mobile-l about this given this > > is > > > > more mobile-targeted, yet some people only operate on one of > wikitech-l > > > or > > > > mobile-l. > > > > > > > > -Adam > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Wikitech-l mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Wikitech-l mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikitech-l mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
