No problem, I'll run some extra queries.

On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 9:04 AM, John <[email protected]> wrote:

> 1 day isnt much to base a decision on, especially on a global level.
> Normally I would use a sample set of at least a week, to a month of values.
> Sorry if I seem like im being a pain, I have just seen a lot of bad choices
> made based off limited data sets. With a wider data set we might find that
> Tuesdays are the slowest day for traffic, or some other factor that skews
> the data. Ensuring data validation is important when making these types of
> calls based off the working dataset.
>
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Toby Negrin <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi John --
> >
> > What do you think would be a better sample? My feeling is that a 24 hour
> > period captures global usage and we're currently at about .01% of page
> > views come to these domains is a pretty good indicator. Keep in mind
> we're
> > doing this for a legitimate technical reason and not arbitrarily. Looking
> > at the UAs is a good idea and we will do that.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > -Toby
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 6:55 AM, John <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Can we look at a wider sample? using a single day as judgement factor
> is
> > a
> > > bad idea. However if the data supports your position I dont see any
> > serious
> > > problems. You might want to take a look at either the UA's or refering
> > > sources to see if there is a primary source for the traffic and
> mitigate
> > > that.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Adam Baso <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Looks like the user pageviews for wap.wikipedia.org and
> > > > mobile.wikipedia.org
> > > > subdomains are approximately 0.02% of the size of pageviews for
> > > > m.wikipedia.org subdomains based on a recent one day check.
> > > >
> > > > hive> select count(*) from
> > > > wmf.webrequest where
> > > > year = 2015 and month = 7 and day = 14
> > > > and access_method = 'mobile web'
> > > > and (uri_host like '%.wap.wikipedia.org' OR uri_host like '%.
> > > > mobile.wikipedia.org')
> > > > and is_pageview = true and agent_type = 'user';
> > > >
> > > > 35,543
> > > >
> > > > hive> select count(*) from
> > > > wmf.webrequest where
> > > > year = 2015 and month = 7 and day = 14
> > > > and access_method = 'mobile web'
> > > > and uri_host like '%.m.wikipedia.org'
> > > > and is_pageview = true and agent_type = 'user';
> > > >
> > > > 202,024,891
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 5:41 AM, John <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > ... Have we done any analysis on usage of those subdomains?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Adam Baso <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > There's a ticket for removing mobile.wikipedia.org and
> > > > wap.wikipedia.org
> > > > > > domains/subdomains, which are legacy domain names superceded by
> > > > > > m.wikipedia.org and its subdomains.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T104942
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The rationale for the removal of these legacy domain names is to
> > help
> > > > > > support HSTS preloading in browsers with the existing TLS SAN
> cert.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > After review of the ticket, can anyone think of a compelling
> reason
> > > to
> > > > > keep
> > > > > > those old domain names?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm going to open a separate thread on mobile-l about this given
> > this
> > > > is
> > > > > > more mobile-targeted, yet some people only operate on one of
> > > wikitech-l
> > > > > or
> > > > > > mobile-l.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Adam
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Wikitech-l mailing list
> > > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Wikitech-l mailing list
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Wikitech-l mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wikitech-l mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikitech-l mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to