I'm not big on rules but I am big on culture. The Internet causes an
unusual phenomenon in people to miscommunicate and in turn say things they
don't really mean because they feel attacked. I genuinely hope efforts like
this, though only a single page of decency in print form, will be taken to
heart by every individual and help make a community we're all proud and
happy to be a part of.


--stephen

On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Frances Hocutt <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On "why is this necessary":
>
> Earlier this year, Nick Coghlan wrote an excellent blog post on why he
> considers fighting abuse in open source communities (Linux, in particular)
> key to getting the best contributions and making his projects the strongest
> they can be. A quote:
>
> "Instead, what I do care about, passionately, is *helping the best ideas
> win* (where I include "feasible" as part of my definition of "best"). Not
> the "best ideas from people willing to tolerate extensive personal abuse".
> The best ideas anyone is willing to share with me, period. And I won't hear
> those ideas unless I help create environments where all participants are
> willing to speak up, not just those that are prepared to accept a
> blistering verbal barrage from a powerful authority figure as a possible
> consequence of attempting to participate."
>
> The whole post is worth a read:
> http://www.curiousefficiency.org/posts/2015/01/abuse-is-not-ok.html
>
> Wikitech is not LKML, but a new contributor isn't going to know that (and
> still, they can look through the archives and find personal attacks!). A
> CoC is one way that we communicate that that's not how we act, and that's
> not how we tolerate other people acting.
>
> -Frances
>
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Frances Hocutt <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > I was also at the Wikimania session where we worked on this draft. I
> > strongly support this effort. Best practices for codes of conduct include
> > clearly defined consequences for breaches, as well as named behaviors
> that
> > are unacceptable (as not everyone shares the same "common sense", and
> > people interested in behaving badly tend to rules-lawyer as well). Our
> > Phabricator etiquette is lacking both of these, and it does not cover the
> > rest of our technical spaces. An effective code of conduct has been shown
> > to be effective at bringing people from underrepresented groups--and
> their
> > contributions!--to events and projects. Screening technical contributors
> by
> > their willingness to take a risk of poor treatment is a terrible idea if
> we
> > want to get as many good contributions as we can.
> >
> > -Frances
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Oliver Keyes <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Thank you for drafting this up, Matt. Who's "we" here?
> >>
> >> On 6 August 2015 at 20:19, Matthew Flaschen <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > On 08/06/2015 08:17 PM, Matthew Flaschen wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> We're in the process of developing a code of conduct for technical
> >> >> spaces.  This will be binding, and apply to all Wikimedia-related
> >> >> technical spaces (including but not limited to MediaWiki.org,
> >> >> Phabricator, Gerrit, technical IRC channels, and Etherpad).
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I forgot to mention (but this is in the draft), it also applies to
> >> physical
> >> > spaces, including but not limited to hackathons.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Matt Flaschen
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Engineering mailing list
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/engineering
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Oliver Keyes
> >> Count Logula
> >> Wikimedia Foundation
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Engineering mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/engineering
> >>
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to