> To better address the needs of our core contributors, we're now focusing
> our strategy on the curation, collaboration, and admin processes that take
> place on a variety of pages. Many of these processes use complex
> workarounds -- templates, categories, transclusions, and lots of
> instructions -- that turn blank wikitext talk pages into structured
> workflows. There are gadgets and user scripts on the larger wikis to help
> with some of these workflows, but these tools aren't standardized or
> universally available.
>
> As these workflows grow in complexity, they become more difficult for the
> next generation of editors to learn and use. This has increased the
> workload on the people who maintain those systems today. Complex workflows
> are also difficult to adapt to other languages, because a wiki with
> thousands of articles may not need the kind of complexity that comes with
> managing a wiki with millions of articles. We've talked about this kind of
> structured workflow support at Wikimania, in user research sessions, and on
> wikis. It's an important area that needs a lot of discussion, exploration,
> and work.
>
> Starting in October, Flow will not be in active development, as we shift
> the team's focus to these other priorities. We'll be helping core
> contributors reduce the stress of an ever-growing workload, and helping the
> next generation of contributors participate in those processes. Further
> development on these projects will be driven by the needs expressed by wiki
> communities.


This sounds a lot like PageTriage, which at best was a mixed success.
I hope the team is able to extract lessons from that extension and
apply them to whatever they intend to work on.

--
bawolff

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to