I hate to say it, but this is exactly why we should be preferring copyleft licenses. GitLab began as completely FOSS, but only later on split into the CE and EE, which they were able to do because they used MIT.
*-- * *Tyler Romeo* Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2016 Major in Computer Science On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Greg Grossmeier <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Brian for your thoughts. > > Only commenting on one small part: > > <quote name="Brian Gerstle" date="2015-10-07" time="11:10:03 -0400"> > > *Pros* > > > > - FLOSS > > ...ish. Not really. "Open Core". > > See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GitLab#History > > A view on why Open Core isn't healthy for FLOSS communities: > http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2009/10/16/open-core-shareware.html > > > Greg > > -- > | Greg Grossmeier GPG: B2FA 27B1 F7EB D327 6B8E | > | identi.ca: @greg A18D 1138 8E47 FAC8 1C7D | > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
