Thanks for the correction & link, Greg, will check that out. Is this different than GitHub's approach? Is it better or worse?
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Tyler Romeo <[email protected]> wrote: > I hate to say it, but this is exactly why we should be preferring copyleft > licenses. GitLab began as completely FOSS, but only later on split into the > CE and EE, which they were able to do because they used MIT. > > > *-- * > *Tyler Romeo* > Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2016 > Major in Computer Science > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Greg Grossmeier <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Thanks Brian for your thoughts. > > > > Only commenting on one small part: > > > > <quote name="Brian Gerstle" date="2015-10-07" time="11:10:03 -0400"> > > > *Pros* > > > > > > - FLOSS > > > > ...ish. Not really. "Open Core". > > > > See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GitLab#History > > > > A view on why Open Core isn't healthy for FLOSS communities: > > http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2009/10/16/open-core-shareware.html > > > > > > Greg > > > > -- > > | Greg Grossmeier GPG: B2FA 27B1 F7EB D327 6B8E | > > | identi.ca: @greg A18D 1138 8E47 FAC8 1C7D | > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikitech-l mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > -- EN Wikipedia user page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Brian.gerstle IRC: bgerstle _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
