Yes, that would mean there would be no information from gerrit. including
information about unmerged reviews. In that case it is probably less than
ideal :).

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Strainu <[email protected]> wrote:

> 2016-10-21 16:08 GMT+03:00 Marielle Volz <[email protected]>:
> > You can add multiple e-mails both to gerrit [0] and github [1]. As long
> as
> > the e-mail address you are making commits with is added to both accounts,
> > you can likely use your preexisting software directly on the mirrored
> > github repos[2]. For example, my contributions to the citoid repo, all of
> > which were made on gerrit, are also automatically* associated with my
> > github account [3]. You could add a throwaway email to both both gerrit
> and
> > github and set this as your git email [4] and then your e-mail will not
> be
> > publicly exposed anywhere.
>
>
> Hi Marielle,
>
> Thank you for your response, it was really informative. Your solution
> seems basically equivalent to skipping gerrit entirely, right? The big
> downside of that is that we can't evaluate changes that were not
> merged. We also can't score the commit based on parameters from the
> review (such as how many versions were uploaded, etc.)
>
> Strainu
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to