If there's not going to be anything to implement, how do you see this as having an effect on anything? What will be done differently or better? Why should anyone be doing any work on it? How will we know whether or not it has been a success, and whther or not the time effort and effort was well-spent?
"Rogol" On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 10:35 PM, Keegan Peterzell <kpeterz...@wikimedia.org > wrote: > On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Rogol Domedonfors <domedonf...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Is the *Technical Collaboration Guidance* > > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Technical_Collaboration_Guidance still > > actively under development? > > > Yes, there are internal stakeholder discussions still underway. > > > > There seems to have been no discussion of any > > substance since January. Is there an intention to bring the discussion > to > > a close > > > Eventually the plan is to remove the draft tag, yes. > > > > and to implement the guidance? > > > As guidance, there is nothing to "implement" as you say. As has been > discussed on the talk page, these are not rules to be placed into effect. > This is a guidance manual from the TC team. The guidance is available for > teams to check if they'd like a written resource for the type of work that > Community Liaisons generally do. > > Further questions are welcome on the talk page, where discussions can be > properly captured on-wiki. > > -- > Keegan Peterzell > Technical Collaboration Specialist > Wikimedia Foundation > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
