On Mon, 20 Mar 2017 at 07:19 Joaquin Oltra Hernandez < [email protected]> wrote:
> Great news! > > Have we considered dropping IE 10 to grade C given Microsoft ended support > for it more than a year ago and it seems to be as low as IE 9 (only a 0.24% > *[1]*)? > Certainly, that would be the next step. I think that the additional burden of IE10 over IE11 is relatively slight, so I'd probably recommend keeping it in Grade A for at least a few months more, unless there's an urgent need. As always, each non-core feature needs to decide for itself what support level is provided for older browsers. (Last week, IE10 is down to 0.22%, BTW — lower than IE4, let alone IE6.) > Also, a question. Does this mean we don't need to explicitly list the > *es5-shim* any more? > Yes, this will mean that. But not until the patch[*] is merged, at which point depending on es5-shim will become a no-op with a deprecation notice (and I'll do patches to fix up WMF-production extensions). [*] - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/340893/ -- James D. Forrester Lead Product Manager, Editing Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. jforrester at wikimedia.org <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l> | @jdforrester _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
