BTW, when looking at these stats, note also that the percentage for IE7 (2.9% recently) is likely inflated due to unidentified bot traffic: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T148461#3011175 https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T157404
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:07 AM, James Forrester <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 20 Mar 2017 at 07:19 Joaquin Oltra Hernandez < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Great news! >> >> Have we considered dropping IE 10 to grade C given Microsoft ended support >> for it more than a year ago and it seems to be as low as IE 9 (only a 0.24% >> *[1]*)? >> > > Certainly, that would be the next step. I think that the additional burden > of IE10 over IE11 is relatively slight, so I'd probably recommend keeping > it in Grade A for at least a few months more, unless there's an urgent > need. As always, each non-core feature needs to decide for itself what > support level is provided for older browsers. > > (Last week, IE10 is down to 0.22%, BTW — lower than IE4, let alone IE6.) > > >> Also, a question. Does this mean we don't need to explicitly list the >> *es5-shim* any more? >> > > Yes, this will mean that. But not until the patch[*] is merged, at which > point depending on es5-shim will become a no-op with a deprecation notice > (and I'll do patches to fix up WMF-production extensions). > > [*] - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/340893/ > -- > > James D. Forrester > Lead Product Manager, Editing > Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. > jforrester at wikimedia.org > <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l> | > @jdforrester > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l -- Tilman Bayer Senior Analyst Wikimedia Foundation IRC (Freenode): HaeB _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
