It might have been on purpose that there was no licensetpl_nonfree. The reason being, that even though that template looks like a license it isn't an actual license. Instead we use fair use rationale's, and these do have licensetpl_nonfree. However this specific file was not using the right template for machine recognizable fair use rationales.
Fixed in: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Odin_lloyd.jpg&diff=776566993&oldid=674493870 On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Brad Jorsch (Anomie) <[email protected] > wrote: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Fako Berkers <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I'm running the tool algo-news and I discovered that this image: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Odin_lloyd.jpg > > Is indicated as a free image in the API: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?format=json&prop= > > pageprops&action=query&redirects=1&pageids=39787564 > > > > Should I report this as a bug? > > > That feature uses the presence of a particular hidden <span> in the HTML of > the page to determine non-freeness. On that particular image, the license > template was missing that span,[1] and it also didn't use the standard > non-free use rationale template[2] which also would have added the needed > span. > > Then null edits to the image and the page fixed things up. > > [1]: Fixed in > https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Non- > free_fair_use&diff=776553380&oldid=749836414 > [2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Non-free_use_rationale > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
