Thanks for the updated statistics. I wonder, was there ever an agreement on how to standardize the definitions for priorities, such as "unbreak now" and "high"? The reason that I ask is that a median age of 738 days for "high" priority tasks seems very long. I would hope that we would not take two years to complete "high" priority tasks.
Thanks, Pine ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine ) On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 9:39 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Community Metrics team, > > This is your automatic monthly Phabricator statistics mail. > > Accounts created in (2018-07): 293 > Active Maniphest users (any activity) in (2018-07): 912 > Task authors in (2018-07): 473 > Users who have closed tasks in (2018-07): 325 > > Projects which had at least one task moved from one column to another on > their workboard in (2018-07): 294 > > Tasks created in (2018-07): 2315 > Tasks closed in (2018-07): 4020 > Open and stalled tasks in total: 38936 > > Median age in days of open tasks by priority: > > Unbreak now: 6 > Needs Triage: 420 > High: 738 > Normal: 965 > Low: 1261 > Lowest: 1222 > > (How long tasks have been open, not how long they have had that priority) > > Active Differential users (any activity) in (2018-07): 21 > > TODO: Numbers which refer to closed tasks might not be correct, as > described in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T1003 . > > Yours sincerely, > Fab Rick Aytor > > (via community_metrics.sh on phab1001 at Wed Aug 1 09:39:50 UTC 2018) > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
