Hi Gergo, I understand that it might take 2 hours to complete a priority X task that has been open for 2 years, but depending on the definition of "high" priority, it seems to me that the median high priority task should be open for fewer than 2 years.
Maybe this is a complex enough topic that it would be better discussed during one of the regular technology office hours. Do you have a suggestion about which office hour would be most appropriate, if you think that an office hour would be a good venue for a discussion? Thanks, Pine ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine ) On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 6:49 PM, Gergo Tisza <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 8:14 PM Pine W <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Thanks for the updated statistics. I wonder, was there ever an agreement > on > > how to standardize the definitions for priorities, such as "unbreak now" > > and "high"? The reason that I ask is that a median age of 738 days for > > "high" priority tasks seems very long. I would hope that we would not > take > > two years to complete "high" priority tasks. > > > > The median age of open priority X tasks is not the same as the median time > it takes to complete priority X tasks. > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
