I would say that it's useful to me to identify and declare blocks, sometimes I get more attention from SoS instead of Phab and Gerrit discussions (even in this new email list model). And I also use some filtering for keywords to highlight if the team and projects I'm part of are mentioned in case I miss something. Maybe I'm overfitted [1] to the task and SoS could be rethought, but right now I'm not against to keeping it.
I imagine it's a burden to house-keep SoS every week, perhaps the email list could be more automated to reduce that burden? [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overfitting On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 2:16 PM Željko Filipin <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > TLDR: reply to me (off-list) if you would think Scrum of scrums is still > useful. > > I've been sending Scrum of scrums[0] mails to wikitech-l list since > 2019-03-20[1]. The meeting has existed since 2013. I haven't done any > proper research, but a quick look says the number of participating > teams is decreasing significantly. > > Quick sample, the first meeting of July in years 2014-2020. > > 2014-07-09 14 > 2015-07-01 12 > 2016-07-06 18 > 2017-07-05 16 > 2018-07-11 18 > 2019-07-03 16 > 2020-07-01 8 > > Željko > -- > 0: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Scrum_of_scrums > 1: https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2019-March/091817.html > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
