Agreed, my policy includes: > Basically, you should be able to understand, explain, and justify any code that an AI tool contributes to your PR.
Cheers, -Travis On Sun, Jan 25, 2026 at 6:20 PM Brian Wolff via Wikitech-l < [email protected]> wrote: > I'm of the opinion if people can tell you are using an LLM you are using > it wrong. Its still expected that you fully understand any patch you > submit. I think if you use an LLM to help you nobody would complain or > really notice, but if you blindly submit an LLM authored patch without > understanding how it works people will get frustrated with you very quickly. > > -- > Brian > > On Sunday, 25 January 2026, Travis Briggs via Wikitech-l < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I know there's been a lot of discussion/concern and policy decisions >> around usage of LLMs for authoring content in Wikimedia projects. >> >> I wonder if there's been similar discussion around AI coding for >> technical editors? I'm not sure I've seen it "go by". Can someone link to >> where these discussions are happening? >> >> I also wanted to share a policy I wrote for WP1: >> https://github.com/openzim/wp1/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#usage-of-llmsai-coding-assistants >> >> Cheers, >> -Travis >> > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/postorius/lists/wikitech-l.lists.wikimedia.org/
_______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/postorius/lists/wikitech-l.lists.wikimedia.org/
