Philippe, Juan: 2010/8/10 Juan de Vojníkov <[email protected]>
> Well, the number of pages is also a question. Now it looks like that it is > enough for Foundation to look on the quality and/or vitality of the project. > Well there is not other way how to evaluate it. > > But according my opinion it doesnt say nothing about Wikiversity. It is a > good measure of succes for wp (no. of articles), wikt (no. of words), wb > (no. of pages of a textbook). But for wv number of educational resources? > How educational resource is defined? Lets have a look on Bloom Clock, it can > cover 20% of total article count. I.e. there are 6 thousand pages on the > project and 2 thousand are botanical items. So thats why number of pages is > not good enough to evaluate wv. > > And well, thanks to Philippe Beaudette "after many core contributors left" > is a better statement. > I don't want to deprive you of a discussion of Wikiveristy vitality. I think this is the purpose of this mailing list. However, I would invite either or both of you to start up a new thread on this, as this thread is supposed to be on the Sandbox Server. I would gladly participate on such a thread, in fact. If, of course, you guys want to talk more about the Sandbox server, have some suggestions or comments, or a question on this, please hit reply and wax eloquently. :) Thanks, Gerald
_______________________________________________ Wikiversity-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiversity-l
