In a message dated 1/22/2011 2:15:11 PM Pacific Standard Time, [email protected] writes:
> As you indicated, a core group started > things, and for the most part these people are still around and have > the power to write checks and so forth. However, it's not as if they > rule with an iron fist or anything like that. Most discussions seem > to happen in public mailing lists, and the people who have the power > to sign checks seem pretty adamant that that's where "decisions" are > made too. There is no evidence that those who are at the top, have any inclination whatsoever to be subject to vote. There are no votes for any board members, nor any officers. All positions are appointed by those at the top. That's not any sort of "open governance" of which I'm aware. It's the complete opposite. It's an oligarchy. There is no path, nor even any possibility of any person gaining any form of power within P2PU outside of those who currently rule. That's how it stands today. That's my critique. Will Johnson
_______________________________________________ Wikiversity-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiversity-l
