My first reactionary response is to say that its a user problem. But since that isn't what Strawberry is supposed to be about, the right approach is probably to detect other Perls in the PATH and ask which should be preferred.
However, I'd like to hear more about the nature of the problems. Unless Padre is shelling out to "perl" and not $^X. I'm surprised that the problems are significant. David On 12/12/08, Gabor Szabo <szab...@gmail.com> wrote: > Adam, > > I seem to see too many people falling in the trap of not > removing Active Perl before trying to use Strawberry Perl > and when things don't work blaming it on Strawberry Perl. > > In order to reduce the frustration, if possible Strawberry should > work along with other installed perl just as you can install > several perls on Linux. > > If it is not possible or too much work it should try to recognize > that there is another Perl in the PATH and warn about it. > > Gabor > -- Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com
