Agreed. This is part of what I was complaining about on this list for so long. I am not unhappy with Netraverse's products so far, just the ammount of communication. Things like changelogs in the same manner that the kernel changelog summary is built, or just a general one with each release. A good communications practice will take the company leaps/bounds ahead of what other companies have ever done in general. -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-796-9023 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----Original Message----- > From: robert w hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2001 9:15 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Win4Lin-users] 'dos' in 3.0.2/what's in 2.4.6 > > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, robert w hall > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > >Is this not-unwelcome change an intended new facility or > just a random > >change in a config file? > >Bob > nobody's come back on this - on my setup it's a real and welcome > improvement. > > Please, please Netraverse - It would be nice if there were proper > ChangeLogs for each release - so we would know whether to hurry to > reinstall. > > Bob > > PS there was a rumour started on the list that in kernel 2.4.6 the vm > model would change again - according to a thread ('2.4.6') on > slackware > development forum, these changes are running-repairs only > > -- > robert w hall > _______________________________________________ > Win4Lin-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.netraverse.com/mailman/listinfo/win4lin-users > _______________________________________________ Win4Lin-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.netraverse.com/mailman/listinfo/win4lin-users
