Thanks for all the feedback everyone. I haven't had a chance to look at
mkcvspatch in enough detail yet to know if it would make more sense to
work on that or the script I submitted. I'll probably submit something
in a week.
Patrik Stridvall wrote:
>
> > > > Well, I posted script called mkcvspatch to the list
> > almost a year ago.
> > > > It didn't cause very much excitement, so I didn't bother posting
> > > > any new versions.
> > >
> > > I suppose few of us need that kind of hard-to-use tool
> > (writing spec files
> > > etc... ugh), it's not like most of us do that kind of
> > large-scale work
> > > that requires keeping a lot of unsubmitted/rejected stuff
> > around in our
> > > trees for a long time...
> >
> > Well, I just cvs diff the files I know are affected and send
> > them off to
> > Alexandre. No need for scripts.
>
> Well yes, but as Ove said, some people like me usually have quite a lot
> of rejected, untested or work in progress stuff so I have found it very
> useful that why I wrote it.
...
--
Steven Elliott ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
