> > If it's license compatible, and does the job, then yes. Is
> this the case,
> > though??
>
> Use of gettext does not enforce license change,
... until the day when we want to support runtime selectable
debug message language. No thanks.
As a side note for people that don't know.
GNU GetText is under the GPL. Not, I repeat not, the LGPL.
> require it
> for buildng, just like we do for GNU gcc. It also supports
> argument reordering
> etc.
Sure, but we need to implement FormatMessage anyway so using
a FormatMessage like scheme like not cost very much
implementation wise.
In short, using GNU GetText is both impossible (license wise)
and unnessary.
