Ove Kaaven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now actually, I have mostly done so; I am able to start some DOS apps, but
> not as many as before the ASS yet, and I've changed large parts of DOS
> support code, so it's also hard to separate into a set of independent
> patches that I can submit. (Things I've done include: moved the lpDosTask
> pointer away from NE_MODULE and into the PDB instead, also removing the
> hModule parameter of the DOSMEM routines, cleaned up the DPMI
> implementation, did more work for using the Win32 console routines,
> rewritten parts of the DOSVM_* routines and much of the MZ_* routines...)
What I think should be done with the DOS support is to make dosmod a
separate Winelib app. The current implementation makes it impossible
to cleanly separate dlls, because the DOS stuff needs routines from
USER.
> But I don't have time to work more on this currently. But if anyone want
> the megapatch and would like to work on it (or think that I can just
> submit said megapatch myself without more cleaning up or bugfixing) then I
> can probably send it somehow...
You can always submit it, and I'll apply the parts I like (if any ;-)
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
