At 06:32 AM 7/12/00 +0200, you wrote:
>
>On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, gerard patel wrote:
>
>> I have the following questions for the Linux specialists out there.
>> 1) what are the chances of this patch to become the default in some near future ?
>
>Slim if we complain?
If it's not enough, Alexandre Julliard can always threaten to remove
Linus T. from the contributor's list ;-)
>> 2) what could be the best way to solve such problem :
>> - if a PE module where preferred loadaddress = 0 gets an address below < 400000
>hex, print a
>> warning.
>
>I'd have thought the allocated address was above. It was the libc.so that
>occupied the address that the Windows app wanted.
Yes, correct. Another approach should be used.
Gerard
