Andreas Mohr wrote: > Sure, that's what I'll be working on soon. > However most probably that won't be libraries (.so), but rather completely > new NE or PE "fake DLLs" with a complete header and version resources. Will you then be building the wine code into these DLL files rather than into real .so files? And if not, will there be some mechanism by which if someone tries to dynamically load one of these DLLs, it will dynamically load the real .so file in addition or instead? Out of interest, why do you want fake NE/PE DLLs? Is it because some programs try to 'manually' parse the DLLs rather than using system routines? David Howells
- Windows system DLLs without Windows installation David Howells
- Re: Windows system DLLs without Windows installation Andreas Mohr
- Re: Windows system DLLs without Windows installat... David Howells
- Re: Windows system DLLs without Windows installat... Andreas Mohr
- Re: Windows system DLLs without Windows insta... David Howells
- Re: Windows system DLLs without Windows insta... David Elliott
- Re: Windows system DLLs without Windows i... Andreas Mohr
- Re: Windows system DLLs without Wind... Juergen Schmied
- Re: Windows system DLLs without Windows insta... Andreas Mohr
- Re: Windows system DLLs without Windows i... David Howells
- Re: Windows system DLLs without Wind... Bradley Baetz
- Re: Windows system DLLs without Windows insta... Peter Ganten
- Re: Windows system DLLs without Windows insta... Petr Tomasek