I'll see if I can get a copy of that application or something that
exhibits the same behavior. As far as the MIN/MAX goes, does anyone have
any preference as to whether we add the below defines to windef.h or
should I change the MIN/MAX's to min/max's?
Chris
==================================================================
RCS file: /home/wine/wine/include/windef.h,v
retrieving revision 1.32
diff -u -r1.32 windef.h
--- include/windef.h 2000/08/11 00:39:39 1.32
+++ include/windef.h 2000/09/11 22:52:06
@@ -437,6 +437,17 @@
#define min(a,b) (((a) < (b)) ? (a) : (b))
#endif
+#ifdef MAX
+#undef MAX
+#endif
+#define MAX(a,b) max(a,b)
+
+#ifdef MIN
+#undef MIN
+#endif
+#define MIN(a,b) min(a,b)
On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, gerard patel wrote:
> At 02:32 PM 9/11/00 -0500, you wrote:
> >
> >Here is the *REAL* patch(s) that I intended to send. Sorry about that...
>
> Maybe the Corel version is better, but I have a regression when I
> test your patch :-(. Unfortunately the app is not freeware (Borland Builder 4
> pro), there is a tree to pick a directory in the Options dialog box, the tree is no
> more filled after your patch, only the root can be partially seen (or it's filled but
> not displayed, I'm beginning to feel tired and I will not test further this night)
>
> Hmm, I hope I have not mixed your patches, because I get compile warnings
> about MIN and MAX, I don't remember when these macros were changed in
> the wine tree, but it was not yesterday I'm sure. The one I test is 128K against
> 118K for the current Cvs version.
>
> Gerard
>
>
