James Juran wrote:
>
> But a manually edited FAQ requires rather constant (or at least
> consistent) attention, which it is not receiving now. Unless someone is
> willing to be a more regular FAQ editor than the current WineHQ
> maintenance staff (of which I'm a member, so I'm not bashing them at all
> :-)), a FAQ-O-MATIC has a much better chance of being up-to-date.
>
> A potential compromise would be to have a manually-edited section and a
> FAQ-O-MATIC section, with good content occasionally pulled from the
> world-updatable section into the "official" section.
what kind of qualifications would make a good human faq editor? I'm not
a programmer, but I'd like to do something for this project...
--
Douglas J. Hunley (Linux User #174778)
http://hunley.homeip.net/
printk("Illegal format on cdrom. Pester manufacturer.\n");
2.2.16 /usr/src/linux/fs/isofs/inode.c
