Ove Kaaven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1. Is there a particular reason why libwine_unicode.so can't just be in
> the same directory as libwine.so, since it's not really a "DLL"? Shouldn't
> take a special rpath to find it...
libwine_unicode.so will definitely be in the same directory as
libwine.so; but this can be a non-standard place, which is why we need
rpath. In fact libwine and libwine_unicode are the only libraries that
need it, because they are (should be) the only ones loaded implicitly
by ld.so.
At the moment we have the problem that dlls import one another at the
ELF level, which is why they have to be installed in the same
directory and with the same rpath as libwine.so. But once import
tables are working, dlls will only import each other through an
explicit dlopen using EXTRA_LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
Basically the final situation should be:
- libwine.so and libwine_unicode.so in $(prefix)/lib
- all dlls .so in $(prefix)/lib/wine
- rpath set to $(prefix)/lib
- EXTRA_LD_LIBRARY_PATH set to $(prefix)/lib/wine
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
