On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 10:08:08AM -0700, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Ove Kaaven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > That was what my solution of setting the rpath to $(prefix)/lib/wine was
> > supposed to solve. Binary packagers tend to *not* install the dlls into
> > the same path as libwine.so right now... while libwine.so is in a standard
> > path and does not need rpath.
>
> I'm not so sure that libwine.so is always in a standard path; many
> people seem to have trouble with /usr/local/lib. Anyway, AFAICS with
> Marcus solution, packagers who don't want things in /usr/lib should be
> able to do ./configure --libdir=/usr/lib/wine and have all the
> libraries nicely separated.
Yup. I was exactly using that (with /etc/ld.so.conf until now) on OpenLinux.
All wine .so files reside in /usr/lib/wine/, since they belong together.
(The FHS is not clear on using both the main library directory and a packages
own as far as I remember.)
Ciao, Marcus
