On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Andreas Mohr wrote: > This wouldn't result at all in not having a need to change the license. > Currently everybody can rob the hell out of us (yeah, I know, drastic > words :). > With "selective" licensing, you could make "beneficial" companies benefit. > > Anyway, that was only some suggestion of some /. guy, not sure whether > it's a good idea. > By way of compromise, and maybe keep Gav happy, would it make sense to license those parts of Wine that have fairly well established implementations as LGPL, and "stub dll's" as frre-for-all? I know it is a fuzzy distinction, and it could be a fair bit of work to actually do it and I guess it would need to be adjusted continually...
FWIW Lawson The Devil finds work for idle minds.
